单路PK 英特尔E3、E5性能对比(图)(1)(4)
| SiSoftware Sandra Pro Business 2012 | ||
| 产品名称 | 至强E5-1650 | 至强E3-1240 |
| 平台类型 | 单路Intel SandyBridge-EP | 单路Intel SandyBridge |
| Processor Arithmetic Benchmark 处理器算术运算测试 |
||
|---|---|---|
| 总计本地功效 | 163.35GOPS | 103.19GOPS |
| 总计本地功效对比速度 | 43.09MOPS/MHz | 27.95MOPS/MHz |
| Dhrystone iSSE4.2 | 208.78GIPS | 131.6GIPS |
| Dhrystone iSSE4.2 vs SPEED | 55.07MIPS/MHz | 35.65MIPS/MHz |
| Whetstone iSSE3 | 127.8GFLOPS | 81GFLOPS |
| Dhrystone iSSE3 vs SPEED | 33.71MFLOPS/MHz | 21.9MFLOPS/MHz |
| Processor Multi-Media Benchmark 处理器多媒体测试 |
||
| 总计多媒体功效 | 364.88MPixel/s | 170MPixel/s |
| 总计多媒体功效对比速度 | 96.25kPixels/s/MHz | 46.06kPixels/s/MHz |
| Multi-Media Int x16 iSSE4.1 | 314MPixel/s | 195.12MPixel/s |
| Multi-Media Int x16 iSSE4.1 vs SPEED | 82.81kPixels/s/MHz | 52.85kPixel/s/MHz |
| Multi-Media Float x8 iSSE2 | 424.08MPixel/s | 148.2MPixel/s |
| Multi-Media Float x8 iSSE2 vs SPEED | 111.87kPixels/s/MHz |
40.14kPixels/s/MHz |
| Multi-Media Double x4 iSSE2 | 242.8MPixel/s | 81MPixel/s |
| Multi-Media Double x4 iSSE2 vs SPEED | 64.05kPixels/s/MHz |
21.93kPixels/s/MHz |
| Multi-Core Efficiency Benchmark 处理器效能测试 |
||
| 内联核带宽 | 33.75GB/s | 21.24GB/s |
| 内联核带宽对比速度 | 9.12MB/s/MHz | 5.89MB/s/MHz |
| 内联核延迟(越小越好) | 48.0ns | 43.3ns |
| 内联核延迟对比速度(越小越好) | 0.13ns/MHz | 0.12ns/MHz |
| Java算数性能测试 | ||
| 总计 Java 功效 | 112.66GOPS |
75.7GOPS |
| 总计 Java 功效对比速度 | 29.72MOPSMHz | 20.50MOPSMHz |
| Dhrystone Java | 199.84GIPS | 119GIPS |
| Dhrystone Java对比速度 | 52.71MIPS/MHz | 32.21MIPS/MHz |
| Whetstone Java | 63.51GFLOPS | 48.18GFLOPS |
| Whetstone Java对比速度 | 16.75MFLOPSMHz | 13.05MFLOPS/MHz |
| Java多媒体性能测试 | ||
| 总计多媒体Java功效 | 42MPixel/s | 29.5MPixel/s |
| 总计多媒体Java功效对比速度 | 11.09kPixels/s/MHz | 7.99kPixels/s/MHz |
| 多媒体整数 x1 Java | 44.16MPixel/s | 28.82MPixel/s |
| 多媒体整数 x1 Java对比速度 | 11.65kPixels/s/MHz | 7.80kPixels/s/MHz |
| 多媒体浮点数 x1 Java | 40MPixel/s | 30.2MPixel/s |
| 多媒体浮点数 x1 Java对比速度 | 10.56kPixels/s/MHz | 8.18kPixels/s/MHz |
| 多媒体双精度 x1 Java | 39.53MPixel/s | 25.9MPixel/s |
| 多媒体双精度 x1 Java对比速度 | 10.43kPixels/s/MHz | 7.02kPixels/s/MHz |
| .NET Arithmetic Benchmark .NET算术运算测试 |
||
| 总计 .NET 功效 | 29.25GOPS | 29.1GOPS |
| 总计 .NET 功效对比速度 | 7.72MOPS/MHz | 7.88MOPS/MHz |
| Dhrystone .NET | 10.45GIPS | 17.48GIPS |
| Dhrystone .NET vs SPEED | 2.76MIPS/MHz | 4.73MIPS/MHz |
| Whetstone .NET | 81.86GFLOPS | 48.48GFLOPS |
| Whetstone .NET vs SPEED | 21.59MFLOPS/MHz | 13.13MFLOPS/MHz |
| .NET Multi-Media Benchmark .NET多媒体测试 |
||
| 总计多媒体.NET功效 | 44.56MPixel/s | 22MPixel/s |
| 总计多媒体.NET功效对比速度 | 11.75kPixels/MHz | 5.96kPixels/MHz |
| 多媒体整数 x1 .NET | 49.48MPixel/s | 36.46MPixel/s |
| 多媒体整数x1 .NET vs SPEED | 13.05kPixels/s/MHz | 9.87kPixels/s/MHz |
| 多媒体浮点数 x1 .NET | 20.3MPixel/s | 13.28MPixel/s |
| 多媒体浮点数 x1 .NET vs SPEED | 5.36kPixels/s/MHz | 3.60kPixels/s/MHz |
| 多媒体双精度 x1 .NET | 40.14MPixel/s | 26.23MPixel/s |
| 多媒体双精度 x1 .NET vs SPEED | 10.59kPixels/s/MHz | 7.10kPixels/s/MHz |
从上面的对比来看，除了个别项目中E5-1650的成绩相比E3-1240来说低了一些之外，大部分项目的成绩都有明显提升，幅度达到了70%以上，部分项目的成绩出现了翻几倍的情况。虽然E5-1650相比E3-1240来说在主频上略低，但是核心数量的优势在这里得到了充分体现，也是提升性能的关键。
评论暂时关闭