本次测试的至强E3-1275是E3系列的高端产品,具备了4核心8线程,性能非常强悍。下面,我们将关闭E3-1275的超线程功能,观察在这个状态下它的性能表现,以便总结超线程技术对于Sandy Bridge处理器的影响。

SiSoftware Sandra Lite 2011
产品名称 至强E3-1275开启) 至强E3-1275关闭)
平台类型 单路Sandy Bridge 单路Sandy Bridge
Processor Arithmetic Benchmark
处理器算术运算测试
Dhrystone ALU 136.74GIPS 106.77GIPS
Dhrystone ALU vs SPEED 35.98MIPS/MHz 28.86MIPS/MHz
Whetstone iSSE3 83.43 GFLOPS 49.57 GFLOPS
Dhrystone iSSE3 vs SPEED 21.96 MFLOPS/MHz 13.40MFLOPS/MHz
Processor Multi-Media Benchmark
处理器多媒体测试
Multi-Media Int x16 iSSE4.1 201.26MPixel/s 163.79MPixel/s
Multi-Media Int x16 iSSE4.1 vs SPEED 78.26 kPixels/s/MHz 63.69kPixels/s/MHz
Multi-Media Float x8 iSSE2 153MPixel/s 111.37 MPixel/s
Multi-Media Float x8 iSSE2 vs SPEED 59.48 kPixels/s/MHz 43.3kPixels/s/MHz
Multi-Media Double x4 iSSE2 83.54MPixel/s 60.16MPixel/s
Multi-Media Double x4 iSSE2 vs SPEED 32.49 kPixels/s/MHz 23.4kPixels/s/MHz
Multi-Core Efficiency Benchmark
处理器效能测试
Inter-Core Bandwidth 16 GB/s 8.84GB/s
Inter-Core Bandwidth vs SPEED 4.29 MB/s/MHz 2.45MB/s/MHz
Inter-Core Latency(越小越好) 42.4ns 40.2ns
Inter-Core Latency vs SPEED(越小越好) 0.01ns/MHz 0.11ns/MHz
.NET Arithmetic Benchmark
.NET算术运算测试
Dhrystone .NET 18GIPS 15.81GIPS
Dhrystone .NET vs SPEED 5MIPS/MHz 4.16MIPS/MHz
Whetstone .NET 50.1 GFLOPS 29.34GFLOPS
Whetstone .NET vs SPEED 13.92MFLOPS/MHz 7.72MFLOPS/MHz
.NET Multi-Media Benchmark
.NET多媒体测试
Multi-Media Int x1 .NET 37.72 MPixel/s 29.17MPixel/s
Multi-Media Int x1 .NET vs SPEED 9.93MPixel/s 7.68kPixels/s/MHz
Multi-Media Float x1 .NET 13.7MPixel/s 8.16MPixel/s
Multi-Media Float x1 .NET vs SPEED 3.61kPixels/s/MHz 2.15kPixels/s/MHz
Multi-Media Double x1 .NET 27.22 MPixel/s 16.24MPixel/s
Multi-Media Double x1 .NET vs SPEED 7.16 kPixels/s/MHz 4.27kPixels/s/MHz

对比开启与关闭超线程的测试数据我们发现,处理器计算性能方面,开启超线程之后会有30%-50%左右的性能提升,多媒体方面的性能提升为30%左右。而在.NET测试中,这个数值被缩小到了15%-30%,效能测试的时候两者的差距大约为40%。总体而言,在开启超线程之后,Sandy Bridge至强处理器在运算性能上会有30%左右的提升,这个数值与Nehalem与Westmere的成绩是差不多的,事实上我们也没发现Sandy Bridge在超线程方面有什么特别大的改动。


相关内容