笔者还进行了开关超线程的测试,以对比在Nehalem-EX平台上超线程起到的影响力度:

SiSoftware Sandra Pro Business 2010
测试对象 双路Intel Westmere-EP
Xeon X5680
3.33GHz
DELL PowerEdge M910
四路Intel Nehalem-EX
Xeon E7540
2.0GHz

四路Intel Nehalem-EX
Xeon X7560

2.27GHz
超线程关闭

四路Intel Nehalem-EX
Xeon X7560
2.27GHz
Processor Arithmetic Benchmark
处理器算术性能测试
Aggregate Arithmetic Performance 249.2GOPS 298.6GOPS 337.12GOPS 451.7GOPS
Dhrystone iSSE4.2 291.36GIPS 350.47GIPS 440GIPS 518.5GIPS
Whetstone iSSE3 207GFLOPS 246.73GFLOPS 234.22GFLOPS 385GFLOPS
Processor Multi-Media Benchmark
处理器多媒体性能测试
Aggregate Multi-Media Performance 465.8MPixel/s 562.11MPixel/s 752.77MPixel/s 852.7MPixel/s
Multi-Media Int x16 iSSE4.1 534.13MPixel/s 646.86MPixel/s 860.65MPixel/s 979.21MPixel/s
Multi-Media Float x8 iSSE2 397.47MPixel/s 477.37MPixel/s 644.9MPixel/s 726.17MPixel/s
Multi-Media Double x4 iSSE2 216.17MPixel/s 260MPixel/s 324.72MPixel/s 394.66MPixel/s
Multi-Core Efficiency Benchmark
多核效率测试
Inter-Core Bandwidth 84GB/s   126.76GB/s  
Inter-Core Latency
(越小越好)
16ns   76ns  
Cryptography Benchmark
加密解密性能测试
Cryptographic Bandwidth 11.72GB/s 3GB/s 4.46GB/s 4.51GB/s
AES128-ECB iAES
Cryptographic Bandwidth
21GB/s 2.88GB/s 4GB/s 4.36GB/s
SHA256 iSSE4 Hashing Bandwidth 2.52GB/s 3GB/s 4.88GB/s 4.66GB/s
.NET Arithmetic Benchmark
.NET算术性能测试
Aggregate .NET Performance 80.22GOPS 89.47GOPS 128.11GOPS 134.76GOPS
Dhrystone .NET 37GIPS 31.67GIPS 101.25GIPS 49.18GIPS
Whetstone .NET 123.43GFLOPS 147.26GFLOPS 155GFLOPS 220.35GFLOPS
.NET Multi-Media Benchmark
.NET多媒体性能测试
Aggregate .NET Multi-Media Performance 71.4MPixel/s 90MPixel/s 107.7MPixel/s 136.17MPixel/s
Multi-Media Int x1 .NET 100.36MPixel/s 127.38MPixel/s 167.4MPixel/s 191.7MPixel/s
Multi-Media Float x1 .NET 42.42MPixel/s 52.7MPixel/s 48MPixel/s 80.64MPixel/s
Multi-Media Double x1 .NET 78.48MPixel/s 102.48MPixel/s 89.36MPixel/s 156.37MPixel/s

总运算性能明显地下降了,不过多核效率测试神奇地可以运行了。少数测试在关闭超线程状态下运行得更好:SHA256 iSSE4 Hashing Bandwidth和Dhrystone .NET Arithmetic Benchmark。


相关内容

    暂无相关文章